Skip Navigation



Social History of Medicine Advance Access published online on October 21, 2008

Social History of Medicine, doi:10.1093/shm/hkn062
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/3/573    most recent
hkn062v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Noymer, A.
Right arrow Articles by Jarosz, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved.

Second Opinions

Nineteenth-Century New England: The Dominance of Infectious Disease

Andrew Noymer* and Beth Jarosz {dagger}

* Department of Sociology, University of California, 3151 Social Sciences Plaza, Irvine, CA 92697, USA. E-mail: noymer{at}uci.edu. (Also affiliated to Health and Global Change, IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria.)


   Abstract

This is a response to the recent contribution by Flurin Condrau and Michael Worboys on epidemics and infections in the nineteenth century. We present data from New England showing that infectious disease deaths were in the majority in the nineteenth century. In the data we examine, the epidemiologic transition is intact.


{dagger} Association of San Diego Governments, 401 B Street, Suite 800, San Diego, CA 92101, USA. E-mail: beth.jarosz{at}gmail.com


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soc Hist MedHome page
F. Condrau and M. Worboys
Epidemics and Infections in Nineteenth-Century Britain
Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2009; 22(1): 165 - 171.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.