Skip Navigation



Social History of Medicine Advance Access published online on March 5, 2008

Social History of Medicine, doi:10.1093/shm/hkn001
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/145    most recent
hkn001v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Rogers, N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved

‘Silence has its own Stories’: Elizabeth Kenny, Polio and the Culture of Medicine

Naomi Rogers*

* Section of the History of Medicine and Women's Gender and Sexuality Studies Program, Yale University, PO Box 208324, New Haven CT 06520–8324, USA. E-mail: Naomi.rogers{at}yale.edu


   Abstract

Summary This essay examines four topics in medical history, drawing examples both from recent historical works and also from the author's own research on medicine in the United States in the 1940s and 1950s. The topics are the visibility and management of symptoms in clinical practice, particularly pain in polio; the changes in deception and truth-telling in clinical diagnosis and prognosis, such as the silence chosen by both physicians and families around terminal illnesses like ovarian cancer; debates around the etiquette of publicity within the medical profession and the historical creation of a lay ‘public’ considered irrational and easily swayed; and the making of medical films as sources of scientific evidence. A focus on Sister Elizabeth Kenny, an Australian nurse based in Minneapolis in the 1940s and early 1950s, who developed controversial methods of treating patients paralysed by polio, is used to link these themes together around the boundaries of medical authority: the struggle to define who can make symptoms visible and significant, give or withhold the truth of a terminal diagnosis, set standards of professional respectability, and assess the authenticity of evidence presented as ‘scientific’.

Keywords: medical authority; medical ethics; history of diagnosis; scientific evidence; history of polio; history of cancer; history of pain management


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.