Social History of Medicine Advance Access published online on October 12, 2007
Social History of Medicine, doi:10.1093/shm/hkm072
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Medical and Demographic History: Inseparable?
* Department of Geography, University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 7ZT, UK. E-mail: riwoods{at}liv.ac.uk
| Abstract |
|---|
Summary The case is made for forms of medical history that focus explicitly on sickness, health and life chances; ones that explore the effects of health interventions by examining their impact on mortality risks. Using a series of examples drawn from environmental health, midwifery and obstetric care, the paper illustrates various ways in which long-term trends in health and mortality may be read together. But it also demonstrates how fraught with problems of description and interpretation this process is likely to be. Finally, a plea is made for evidence-based medical history where progress, outcomes and results are given privileged positions.
Keywords: health impact assessment; mortality differentials; sickness; public health; midwifery; fetal mortality; maternal mortality; historical demography; evidence-based medical history
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. G. Carmichael Introduction Social Science History, September 1, 2009; 33(3): 293 - 305. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Condrau and M. Worboys Epidemics and Infections in Nineteenth-Century Britain Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2009; 22(1): 165 - 171. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

