Social History of Medicine Advance Access published online on February 20, 2006
Social History of Medicine, doi:10.1093/shm/hkj003
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1 History and Politics, The University of Adelaide, North
Terrace, Adelaide SA 5005, Australia
* To whom correspondence should be addressed. The historiography of the growth of government in modern
industrial societies has taken shape around two propositions. The first is that
governments tend inexorably to discipline social life through the elaboration
of an apparatus of inspection and compulsion. The second is that controls of
this kind involve elites in the subordination of relatively powerless social
categories such as women and children, the poor, the sick, immigrants and
minority ethnic groups. This article challenges this meta-narrative in relation
to venereal disease. First, it demonstrates the persistence of voluntary and
non-compulsory forms of control in interwar Edinburgh. Secondly, the article
identifies the contested and negotiated character of regulatory measures.
Finally, it seeks to show that compulsion was not an acceptable and popular
approach to the problem of venereal disease in Britain at this
time.
Article
The Liberty to Spread Disaster: Campaigning for
Compulsion in the Control of Venereal Diseases in Edinburgh in the
1920s
Susan Lemar 1 *
Susan Lemar, E-mail: susan.lemar{at}adelaide.edu.au
![]()
Abstract ![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?