Skip Navigation



Social History of Medicine Advance Access published online on February 20, 2006
Social History of Medicine, doi:10.1093/shm/hkj002
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (Rapid PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/1/37    most recent
hkj002v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ferguson, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Society for the Social History of Medicine 2006, all rights reserved

Article

The Lasting Legacy of a Bigamous Duchess: The Benchmark Precedent for Medical Confidentiality

Angus H. Ferguson 1 *

1 Centre for the History of Medicine, University of Glasgow, Lilybank House, Bute Gardens, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK

* To whom correspondence should be addressed.
Angus H. Ferguson, E-mail: A.Ferguson{at}arts.gla.ac.uk


  Abstract

For all that is currently written on the subject of medical ethics, comparatively little comes from a historical perspective. This article provides socio-historical background on the case that set the boundaries of modern- day definitions of medical confidentiality: the trial of the Duchess of Kingston in 1776. By looking beyond Lord Mansfield's key ruling on confidentiality to the context in which it was made, the paper claims that the precedent did not rest on a debate of the central principles involved. Rather, professional privilege was used by a high-ranking surgeon as a means of maintaining reputation and status when forced to make a public breach of confidentiality.

Keywords: medical ethics; confidentiality; secrecy; privilege; Duchess of Kingston; honour; legal precedent; medical witness.
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.