Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1996 9(3):313-333; doi:10.1093/shm/9.3.313
© 1996 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DAVIDSON, L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

SSHM Prize Essay

‘Identities Ascertained ’: British Ophthalmology in the First Half of the Nineteenth Century

LUKE DAVIDSON*

* History Department, University of York, HeslingtonYork YO1 5DD, UK.

SUMMARY The paper takes Its cue from the work on specialization and American opthalmology, by George Rosen (1944). Where Rosen's account was inspired by sociology, this paper gives a non-teleological account of medical specialization through a cultural history of ophthalmology. The cultural nature of the ophthalmic epidemics motivated practitioners had to study the eye in earnest. These practitioners had to surmount obstacles intrinsic to the medical culture: the division between physicians and surgeons, hostility to specialisms, and the association with quackery. Practitioners justfied their interests through the management of history, the association with philanthropy, and the construction of a father-figure. New interest in the eye was partly ligitimated by the ements:use of existing discourses, both philosophical and religious, that offered practitioners motivating languages to describe their practice. Specialization was effected through varying combinations of elements: emotional and intellectual investment in the eye, the advocacy of further research, and the explicit prosecution of specialties. The process depended upon generalist enthusiasm for the eye, and specialists' championing of generalist medicine. Specialization is a continual cultural process in a constant balancing act with the generalist tendency in medicine

Keywords: Ophthalmology; specialization; medical identity; medical authority; philanthropy; quackery; natural theology; eye; blindness; cultural history


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
V J Marmion
The origin of eye hospitals
Br. J. Ophthalmol., November 1, 2005; 89(11): 1396 - 1397.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.