Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1992 5(1):43-70; doi:10.1093/shm/5.1.43
© 1992 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HAMLIN, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Predisposing Causes and Public Health in Early Nineteenth-Century Medical Thought1

CHRISTOPHER HAMLIN*

*Department of History, University of Notre Dame Indian 46556, USA

SUMMARY The key aetiological issue of the early British public health movement is often seen to be the controversy between contagionism and anticontagionism. More fundamental, however, was a legacy from older constitutional conceptions of disease, of a distinction between exciting and predisposing causes. The centrality of predisposition was a theme in a wide range of medical writings; often predisposing causes were seen as sufficient causes for outbreaks of disease. Physicians who focused on predisposition often, though not always, took an interest in social factors that generated disease. The early public health movement associated with Edwin Chadwick represented then, not the victory of anticontagionism over contagionism, but the gratuitous rejection of a sophisticated understanding of the manifold determinants of health, in favour of a focus on a single, and hypothetical exciting cause. This article points out the inadequacies of the contagionism-anticontagionism characterization of early nineteenth-century aetiological theory, examines the concept of predispositionism as it appeared in the works of many writers, and considers in detail investigations of the Irish fever outbreak of 1817–19, where the concept of predisposition was extensively utilized, and the arguments with which the concept was rejected by Chadwick's associates Thomas Southwood Smith and Neil Arnott.

Keywords: predisposition; aetiology; fever; nutrition; social medicine; public health; contagionism; anticontagionism; disease theory; health


1An earlier version of this paper was given at the wellcome Unit for the History of Medicine at the University of Oxford, 8 March 1990. I thank J. Pickstone, C. Lawrence, M. Pelling, R. Cooter, S. Hoy, and D. Porter for their excellent and helpful criticisms of various drafts.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
C. Hamlin
Commentary: John Sutherland's Epidemiology of Constitutions
Int. J. Epidemiol., October 1, 2002; 31(5): 915 - 919.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Epidemiol. Community HealthHome page
E Perdiguero, J Bernabeu, R Huertas, and E Rodriguez-Ocana
History of health, a valuable tool in public health
J. Epidemiol. Community Health, September 1, 2001; 55(9): 667 - 673.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Contributions to Indian SociologyHome page
H. Naraindas
Poisons, putrescence and the weather: A genealogy of the advent of Tropical Medicine
Contributions to Indian Sociology, May 1, 1996; 30(1): 1 - 35.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Health Politics, Policy and LawHome page
C. Hamlin
Finding a Function for Public Health: Disease Theory or Political Philosophy?
Journal of Health Politics Policy and Law, December 1, 1995; 20(4): 1025 - 1031.
[PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.