Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1992 5(1):1-17; doi:10.1093/shm/5.1.1
© 1992 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by SLACK, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Dearth and Social Policy in Early Modern England

PAUL SLACK*

* Exeter College Oxford OX13DP This paper was presented as the Presidential Address to the Society for the Social History of Medicine, Christ's College, Cambridge, 6 July 1991.

SUMMARY Between 1527 and 1630 the English government invented and implemented an ambitious policy for the provisioning of markets in years of dearth and bad harvest. The policy involved detailed local surveys of corn by jurors and justices of the peace, and arrangements for the weekly supply of the open market. The paper discusses the origins of the policy, the extent of its enforcement, its effects and the reasons for its abandonment after 1630. Political ambitions and capabilities were as important in shaping the government's strategy as economic and market circumstances, and political factors played a part, along with assertions that the policy was counter-productive, in the progressive disenchantment which led to the government's gradual withdrawal from this area of social regulation in the later seventeenth century. It is argued that, in practice, the policy of searches and market-provision did more to remedy deficiencies in the social distribution of scarce grain than deficiencies in its geographical distribution, but that the alternative—free internal trade—would itself probably have done little to ease shortages in the worst-hit areas. Both problems were solved in the later seventeenth century by other means: cash payments through poor-relief to poorer consumers, and changing terms of trade between arable and pastoral areas. By then, however, the dearth strategy had had other positive effects, changing perceptions of famine, poverty, and the ‘entitlements’ of the poor, and encouraging that careful collection and analysis of social and economic data which remained a central feature of English social policy more generally.

Keywords: dearth; famine; marketing; grain; poverty; welfare; Book of Orders; censuses; local government; England


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.