Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 2005 18(1):63-86; doi:10.1093/sochis/hki007
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bufton, M. W.
Right arrow Articles by Melling, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Social History of Medicine Vol. 18 No. 1 © The Society for the Social History of Medicine 2005, all rights reserved.

Coming Up for Air: Experts, Employers, and Workers in Campaigns to Compensate Silicosis Sufferers in Britain, 1918–1939

Mark W. BuftonAF1,AF2 and Joseph MellingAF1

AF1 Silicosis Project and CWP Project, Wellcome Sponsored Centre for Medical History, SHIPSS, Amory Building, Exeter University, Exeter, Devon EX4 4RJ, UK. Email: j.l.melling{at}exeter.ac.uk, AF2 Mark Bufton now: Honorary University Fellow, Exeter University. Email: M.W.Bufton{at}exeter.ac.uk

Government regulation of dangerous trades and the compensation of those injured by their work remains a matter of considerable debate among medical historians. Trade unions have frequently been criticized for pursuing financial awards for their members rather than demanding improvements in health and safety at the workplace. This article examines the neglected subject of silicosis injuries in Britain from the time when the first legislation was passed for the compensation of those suffering from the harmful affects of silica dust in 1918 to the outbreak of war in 1939, when a major new study was under way which would transform the scientific understanding and the legal compensation of those who were diagnosed as being ill with pneumoconiosis. It is argued that in framing legislation for compensation, politicians and their civil servants sought to retain the legal framework created in 1897–1906 and developed a model of industrial insurance which depended to a large extent on a co-operative relationship with leading employers. Medical scientists identified silica as a uniquely hazardous agent in workers' lung disease, while emphasizing the specialist knowledge required for its diagnosis. One remarkable feature of the selective compensation schemes devised after 1918 was the reliance on geological rather than pathological evidence to prove compensation rights, as well as strict employment limits on those eligible to claim. Only the campaigning of labour organizations and persistent evidence of lung disease among anthracite coal miners led to a significant relaxation of compensation rules in 1934 and the fresh scientific investigation which transformed the medical understanding of respiratory illness among industrial workers.

Keywords: twentieth century


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
J. Silvestre
Workplace Accidents and Early Safety Policies in Spain, 1900-1932
Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2008; 21(1): 67 - 86.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
R. Johnston and A. McIvor
Marginalising the Body at Work? Employers' Occupational Health Strategies and Occupational Medicine in Scotland c. 1930-1974
Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2008; 21(1): 127 - 144.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
I. Lowy
The Social History of Medicine: Beyond the Local
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 465 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.