© 2003 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Protecting Patient Privacy or Serving Public Interests?
Challenges to Medical Confidentiality in Imperial Germany
Centre for the History of Medicine and Disease, Wolfson Research Institute, University of Durham, Queen's Campus, University Boulevard, Stockton-on-Tees TS17 6BH, UK. E-mail: a.h.maehle{at}durham.ac.uk
With the Penal Code of 1871, confidentiality became a legal requirement for physicians, surgeons, and other health professions throughout Imperial Germany. However, based on an analysis of the relevant legal cases up to the First World War, this article argues that the professional secrecy of German doctors was increasingly challenged by an ethos that put public interests before patient privacy. This development became particularly tangible in cases of venereal disease, or when interests of the state in criminal prosecution were involved. Yet, medical confidentiality was still better protected in Imperial Germany than in contemporary Britain.
Keywords: medical confidentiality, professional secrecy, Imperial Germany, medical law, medical ethics, medical profession, venereal disease, abortion
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. H. Ferguson The Lasting Legacy of a Bigamous Duchess: The Benchmark Precedent for Medical Confidentiality Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2006; 19(1): 37 - 53. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
