Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 2000 13(3):535-546; doi:10.1093/shm/13.3.535
© 2000 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by CROZIER, I. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Discussion Point

Social Construction in a Cold Climate: A Response to David Harley, ‘Rhetoric and the Social Construction of Sickness and Healing’ and to Paolo Palladino's Comment on Harley

IVAN DALLEY CROZIER*

* Research Fellow, Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL 24 Eversholt St, London NW1 1AD, UK. E-mail: i.dalley-crozier{at}wellcome.ac.uk

The relation of rhetoric to science depends also on whether—to put the two extremes—science is perceived as accretive and progressive or as largely a history of dead ends in experiment and odd dead ‘facts’ now to be read only as allegories of the society that produced them. (Gillian Beer and Herminio Martins1)


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.