Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1998 11(2):283-309; doi:10.1093/shm/11.2.283
© 1998 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (4)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by THOMAS, J.
Right arrow Articles by WILLIAMS, A. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Documents and Sources

Women and Abortion in 1930s Britain: A Survey and its Data

JAMES THOMAS and A. SUSAN WILLIAMS*

* James Thomas, Social Science Research Unit, Institute of Education, University of London 18 Woburn Square, London WC1H 0NS, UK. A. Susan Williams, History and Philosophy, Institute of Education, University of London 20 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AL, UK

SUMMARY This paper examines over 3,000 questionnaires on abortion that were distributed through the National Birthday Trust Fund, a non-governmental organization, to working-class women in municipal hospitals in 1930s Britain. The aim of the survey was to ‘discover the proportion of induced to spontaneous abortions’. Although the study was abandoned due to weaknesses in its design, the collected data contain a mass of detailed information about the lives and reproductive history of working-class women in this period. The background to the survey is discussed, setting it within the development of research on poverty and women's health, as well as contemporary debate on the issue of abortion. The survey data, which are both qualitative and quantitative, are analysed and presented in figures with accompanying commentary. Issues covered include the impact of poverty, overcrowding, reasons for avoiding pregnancy, and contraception.

Keywords: abortion; 1930s Britain; poverty; women; pregnancy; survey; questionnaire; National Birthday Trust Fund; Joint Council of Midwifery


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soc Hist MedHome page
R. Woods
Medical and Demographic History: Inseparable?
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 483 - 503.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.