Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1995 8(2):231-255; doi:10.1093/shm/8.2.231
© 1995 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GALE, C. R.
Right arrow Articles by MARTYN, C. N.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

Dummies and the Health of Hertfordshire Infants, 1911–1930

CATHARINE R. GALE and CHRISTOPHER N. MARTYN*

* MRC Environmental Epidemiology Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton General Hospital Southampton SO9 4XY, UK.

SUMMARY Many medical and child-care experts in the early years of this century viewed the dummy as a serious hazard to the health and development of babies. With the growth of the infant welfare movement, these beliefs were incorporated into health visitors' advice to mothers. A unique set of records made by health visitors in Hertford-shire has been used to explore the determinants and consequences of dummy-use in infancy. These data show that the prevalence of dummy-use, as recorded by health visitors, nearly halved in the period 1911–30, indicating the power of the anti-dummy campaign. Babies in Hertfordshire were more likely to use dummies if they were boys, if their mother was young or had herself been born in the county. Although the incidence of infections and nutritional deficiencies was higher amongst dummy-users, the absolute size of the difference was very small. The intensity of feeling aroused by the dummy in medical and child-care experts is not justified by any evidence from these records concerning the consequences of dummy-use. Opposition to the dummy stemmed in part from the belief that it was a vector of germs and dirt. Diarrhoea was the largest single cause of post-neonatal death in the early twentieth century, and contemporary medical opinion held that ’dirt‘ was somehow responsible, though no association between dummy-use and diarrhoea was found in the Hertfordshire data. Perhaps part of the explanation for the antagonism towards the dummy lies in the conviction, common among child-care experts at this time, that indulging babies' desires for comfort and pleasure would be detrimental to their characters.

Keywords: Dummy; infancy; child health; infant welfare movement


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Int J EpidemiolHome page
G D. Batty, G. D. Smith, C. H D Fall, A. A. Sayer, E. Dennison, C. Cooper, and C. R Gale
Association of diarrhoea in childhood with blood pressure and coronary heart disease in older age: analyses of two UK cohort studies
Int. J. Epidemiol., December 1, 2007; 36(6): 1349 - 1355.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. S. Kramer, R. G. Barr, S. Dagenais, H. Yang, P. Jones, L. Ciofani, and F. Jane
Pacifier Use, Early Weaning, and Cry/Fuss Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial
JAMA, July 18, 2001; 286(3): 322 - 326.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.