Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1995 8(2):211-230; doi:10.1093/shm/8.2.211
© 1995 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WADDINGTON, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

The Nursing Dispute at Guy's Hospital, 1879–1880

KEIR WADDINGTON*

* Department of History, University College London Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

SUMMARY Nursing reforms were rarely introduced into nineteenth-century hospitals without some conflict between their governors and their medical staff. Most historians have seen this as a chapter of nursing history, not part of the history of the medical profession. The nursing dispute at Guy's Hospital, which lasted from December 1879 to September 1880, suggests that wider issues for the medical profession's authority within hospital management were at stake in these disputes and not just their Janus-like attitude to reform. The medical staff at Guy's remained intransigent when a new system of nursing was introduced because they felt that reform threatened their authority at a number of levels. The doctors' rhetoric emphasized the effect reform had on patients, but from the start they questioned the governors' authority to introduce reform and asserted that they should have been consulted before any changes had been made. This issue of authority remained central to the dispute. Public accusations of mismanagement eventually forced a confrontation and the medical staff's collective resolved collapsed with the threat of dismissal, allowing a compromise in favour of the governors. The new system of nursing remained in a modified form and the doctors were invited to take part in a joint management committee that they themselves had initially demanded. An apparent defeat gave the doctors a formal role in the hospital's management that ultimately extended their authority. The dispute is just one example of how the medical profession attempted to assert control over hospital management. In other disputes, like the very public one at Guy's, doctors were forced to compromise and often back down, but out of an apparent defeat they emerged with a negotiated role in the hospital's management that left them in a stronger position than before. Conflict therefore was the medical profession's main vehicle to increased authority.

Keywords: Guy's Hospital; hospital management; nursing dispute; medical authority; medical profession


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
BMJHome page
N. Black
Rise and demise of the hospital: a reappraisal of nursing
BMJ, December 10, 2005; 331(7529): 1394 - 1396.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.