Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1993 6(1):125-142; doi:10.1093/shm/6.1.125
© 1993 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DINGWALL, H. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Archives and Sources

‘General Practice’ in Seventeenth-Century Edinburgh: Evidence from the Burgh Court

HELEN M. DINGWALL*

*Department of Scottish History, University of Edinburgh 17 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LN

SUMMARY The training and practical organization of the Incorporation of Surgeons of Edinburgh are well documented, continuous minutes surviving from 1581, and similar evidence exists for the College of Physicians, founded in 1681. However, these sources give little information on day-to-day general medical practice, such as the employment of a surgeon or physician, or the types of condition treated. Relatively little primary or secondary material is available in relation to Scottish medical practice in the important and turbulent seventeenth century, but one source rather unexpectedly provides a fair amount of information on these matters. The records of the Edinburgh Burgh Court contain a substantial number of cases involving surgeons, physicians, and apothecaries, often suing for non-payment of fees, and it is therefore possible to make some, albeit indirect, assessment of the basic mechanics of consultation and of the procedures followed in cases of non-payment. The court records have been assessed in relation to four main areas: practitioners as plaintiffs, as defendants, as employers of apprentices, and as expert witnesses in criminal trials, and the methods of medical consultation and legal redress outlined. It appears that fairly standard procedures were followed in relation to ‘contracts’ made between practitioner and patient, and also that lines of demarcation between physician and surgeon were less rigorously enforced than might have been assumed. The magistrates attempted to adjudicate fairly and decisions made by the Burgh Court were carefully and often sympathetically considered.

Keywords: General practise; history; Edinburgh; court; seventeenth century; physician; surgeon; procedures


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
A. Withey
Unhealthy Neglect? The Medicine and Medical Historiography of Early Modern Wales
Soc Hist Med, April 1, 2008; 21(1): 163 - 174.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.