Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1991 4(2):295-315; doi:10.1093/shm/4.2.295
© 1991 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by OSWALD, N. T. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

A Social Health Service Without Social Doctors

N. T. A. OSWALD*

*East Barnwelt Health Centre Ditton Lane, Cambridge

SUMMARY During the period before the onset of the Second World War there was increasing support for the ideas of social medicine, in which the promotion of health and the prevention of disease were to be coupled with an accessible and fairly distributed medical service. To realize such a service the basis of medical practice had to move from cure towards prevention, and so did the attitudes of teachers and students in medical schools. While planning for a national health service proceeded, a determined effort was made to reform medical education to produce doctors capable of practising social medicine. Certain individuals, led by William Wilson Jameson and wielding power provided by the Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust and the Interdepartmental Committee on Medical Schools (the Goodenough Committee), made firm proposals for change before the end of the war.

After the war, with a Labour government in power, the National Health Service came into being. However, reaction in the teaching hospitals and in the General Medical Council (GMC) resulted in the setting aside of the proposals for change in medical education, and the chance to train future doctors for a different kind of practice was lost. Consequently, doctors in the NHS have continued to see their role in overwhelmingly curative rather than in social and preventive terms.

Keywords: curative medicine; disease; health; Interdepartmental Committee on Medical Schools; Labour government; medical education; National Health Service; Nuffield Provincial Hospitals Trust; preventive medicine; Second World War; social medicine.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.