Skip Navigation


Social History of Medicine Advance Access originally published online on March 5, 2008
Social History of Medicine 2008 21(1):107-125; doi:10.1093/shm/hkm115
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
21/1/107    most recent
hkm115v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, E.
Right arrow Articles by Rahman, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2008. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved

Framing Mental Illness, 1923–1939: The Maudsley Hospital and its Patients

Edgar Jones and Shahina Rahman*

* Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Weston Education Centre, 10 Cutcombe Road, London SE5 9RJ, UK. E-mail: edgar.jones{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk; E-mail: shahina.rahman{at}iop.kcl.ac.uk


  Abstract

British psychiatric care during the inter-war period has often been characterised in bleak and even punitive terms: an asylum system that required certification for treatment, radical and often risky clinical interventions of no established benefit to patients and a lack of empathy or creativity among doctors. Although the Maudsley Hospital was designed to break the asylum mould, the received view is that a distinctive admissions policy targeted those with a good prognosis, excluding the unruly and chronic. Using random samples drawn from 1924, 1928, 1931, 1935 and 1937–8, this paper explores how changing hypotheses about mental illness influenced the selection and management of Maudsley patients. The largest single diagnosis for in-patients was depression, although 24 per cent had a psychotic disorder. Almost all in-patients resided in Greater London. Only 13 per cent were unskilled workers, 30 per cent being from the professional class. While the key to understanding mental illness was thought to lie in the young, the in-patient population was largely middle-aged. In its operation, the Maudsley did not adhere to the founders' strategic plan but, in the absence of effective treatments, focused on the provision of a changing and varied patient population for its growing army of trainees and researchers.

Keywords: insanity; mental illness; neurosis; psychological disorders; psychiatric patients; psychosis; treatment


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 History of PsychiatryHome page
B. Evans, S. Rahman, and E. Jones
Managing the 'unmanageable': interwar child psychiatry at the Maudsley Hospital, London.
History of Psychiatry, December 1, 2008; 19(76 Pt 4): 454 - 475.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.