Skip Navigation


Social History of Medicine Advance Access originally published online on October 12, 2007
Social History of Medicine 2007 20(3):441-464; doi:10.1093/shm/hkm074
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
20/3/441    most recent
hkm074v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Cooter, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved

After Death/After-'Life': The Social History of Medicine in Post-Postmodernity

Roger Cooter*

* Wellcome Trust Centre for the History of Medicine at UCL, 183 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK. E-mail: r.cooter{at}ucl.ac.uk


  Abstract

Well supported and institutionalised, the social history of medicine thrives. Its research agenda is infinitely expandable, and its humanist sentiments continue to touch emotional cords. Politically and intellectually, however, it is sterile. In a material and intellectual world that is radically different from the one in which it came into being, the social history of medicine has lost its capacity seriously to engage. This paper suggests that medico-centric historians not only have the expertise to re-engage with the contemporary bio-centric world, but that they have need to do so, and, moreover, every reason to take to the task enthusiastically. Crucial to moving on is understanding and seriously engaging with the moral-political and epistemological landscapes for medicine and its historiography, past and present.

Keywords: historiography; Foucault; biomedicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
J. Toms
So What? A Reply to Roger Cooter's 'After Death/After-"Life": The Social History of Medicine in Post-Postmodernity'
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2009; 22(3): 609 - 615.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.