Skip Navigation


Social History of Medicine Advance Access originally published online on October 24, 2006
Social History of Medicine 2006 19(3):407-424; doi:10.1093/shm/hkl045
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
19/3/407    most recent
hkl045v1
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Homei, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

© The Author 2006. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for the Social History of Medicine. All rights reserved

Birth Attendants in Meiji Japan: The Rise of a Medical Birth Model and the New Division of Labour

Aya Homei*

* Centre for the History of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Manchester, Simon Building, Brunswick Street, Manchester M13 9PL, UK. E-mail: homeiaya2001{at}yahoo.co.jp


  Abstract

This article analyses two kinds of medical textbook for midwives published in Japan in the Meiji period (1868–1912), and compares them with the oldest extant guide published in the Edo period (1603–1867). Meiji textbooks, which became foundational to the rise of ‘new-midwives’, were written by a local hygiene officer in the 1880s, and later by obstetric-gynaecologists. Both these groups emerged as ‘modern’ professions in the late nineteenth century, when the government was trying to build a militarily strong, industrially competent state similar to western countries. The textbooks presented knowledge comparable to that in western counterparts. They revealed a clear departure from the Edo tradition, especially in relation to the role of midwives during the process of birth and the use of the hand. The article seeks to demonstrate that the epistemology of scientific midwifery reflected the political, social and professional position and aspirations of these two medical groups. It also argues that the emergence of ‘new-midwifery’ in Meiji Japan, which has usually been seen as part of the ‘westernisation’ of medicine, should not be interpreted in terms of a natural flow of knowledge from west to east.

Keywords: midwifery; obstetrics; ‘normal’ childbirth; westernisation; Japan; nineteenth century


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
I. Lowy
The Social History of Medicine: Beyond the Local
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 465 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
B. Dolan
Twenty Years of Social History of Medicine
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 435 - 440.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.