Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 2004 17(2):223-245; doi:10.1093/shm/17.2.223
© 2004 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Low-beer, D.
Right arrow Articles by Cliff, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Disease and Death in the South African War: Changing Disease Patterns from Soldiers to Refugees

Daniel Low-beer1, Matthew Smallman-raynor2 and Andrew Cliff1

1 Department of Geography, Downing Site, Cambridge University, Cambridge CB2 3HU, UKE-mail: daniel{at}low-beer.com and andy.cliff{at}geog.cam.ac.uk 2 Department of Geography, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UKE-mail: matthew.smallman-raynor{at}nottingham.ac.uk

The involvement of civilians, Boer women, children, and blacks is increasingly integrated within the military history of the South African War. This article assesses the disease history of the war in this context, collating data on mortality from various sources for the first time. Over 60 per cent of total deaths during the war were among civilians, shared among all ethnic groups (Boer, black, and white), and measles was probably the largest killer. Disaggregation by individual refugee camp shows: the rapidity of the epidemics; the early mortality peaks by July 1901; the varied timing and severity of disease by camp; and the importance of measles in explaining the very high mortality rates. At first sight, the decline in overall mortality appears to coincide with the ‘magical effects’ of the British commissions so often cited by historians. However, individual camp mortality curves do not support this historical explanation. We emphasize the epidemiological dynamics of measles, as well as the effects of local camp conditions of overcrowding and malnutrition. Providing a less dashing picture, the South African War is best characterized by measles as well as typhoid. The war shows the crossing in importance of a nineteenth-century military disease history represented by typhoid, and a refugee–civilian disease history that extends to the end of the twentieth century.

Keywords: South African War, disease, mortality, refugee camps, measles, epidemiology, civilian


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.