Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 2004 17(1):93-111; doi:10.1093/shm/17.1.93
© 2004 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Taylor, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Divergent Interests and Cultivated Misunderstandings: The Influence of the West on Modern Chinese Medicine

Kim Taylor

1 Wellcome Trust Research Fellow in the History of Chinese Medicine, Needham Research Institute, East Asian History of Science Library, 8 Sylvester Road, Cambridge CB3 9AF, UK E-mail: kt10005{at}cam.ac.uk

Set in the first forty years of Communist Party rule in China (1949–89), this article will describe how Chinese medicine in modern China has been tailored to some degree by a Western concept of what Chinese medicine ‘really’ should be. After Chinese medicine was reinstated by the Chinese Communist Party as a state-sanctioned system of health care, it had to redefine its role within Chinese society. Western scholarly interest in the medicine was one force which was to leave its mark on this search for identity. The shroud of mystery in which China was enveloped for much of this time was to give rise to two fundamentally contradictory attitudes—one side was Chinese, pushing for a scientification of their medicine, and the other was Western, pushing for more information on a traditional healing method. This article will show how the Chinese medical community contributed to the Western illusion of a static, unchanging medical system, by repeated advertising of the long and rich history of their medicine, and by the use of the translation ‘Traditional Chinese Medicine’ (or ‘TCM’). In turn, Western scholars clamoured for proof of such a tradition, and their attention was directed towards a new form of textbook, namely the ‘Basic Theory of TCM’, which belonged, in fact, to a sideline programme of Chinese medical education—that of teaching it to doctors of Western medicine. Just how such divergent interests and cultivated misunderstandings reinforced one another will be the topic of this article.

Keywords: Chinese medicine; TCM; Basic Theory of TCM; doctors of Western medicine study Chinese medicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Integr Cancer TherHome page
P. Tovey, A. Broom, J. Chatwin, M. Hafeez, and S. Ahmad
Patient Assessment of Effectiveness and Satisfaction With Traditional Medicine, Globalized Complementary and Alternative Medicines, and Allopathic Medicines for Cancer in Pakistan
Integr Cancer Ther, September 1, 2005; 4(3): 242 - 248.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.