Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 2003 16(3):403-418; doi:10.1093/shm/16.3.403
© 2003 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dale, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Implementing the 1913 Mental Deficiency Act:

Competing Priorities and Resource Constraint Evident in the South West of England before 1948

Pamela Dale

Centre for Medical History, Room 329 Amory Building, University of Exeter, Exeter EX4 4RJ, UK. E-mail: Pamela.L.Dale{at}exeter.ac.uk

Mental deficiency policy and practice remain controversial topics within the wider history of institutional and community care. While recent studies have highlighted emerging programmes of community care against a backdrop of fierce eugenic debates, this article focuses on the management of difficult cases within the mental deficiency sector. The Royal Western Counties Institution at Starcross, near Exeter, Devon, is used as a case study to draw attention to a serious conflict between new priorities for mental deficiency work following the 1913 Mental Deficiency Act and older traditions at one of the original five English voluntary idiot asylums. Controversial policies for selecting patients on the basis of class, gender, and grade of mental deficiency underline the importance of both continuity and change between nineteenth- and twentieth-century models of care. The oftendifficult relationship that existed between the institution and the local authorities that financed it is explored in terms of guiding principles as well as exceptional cases. The control of women patients, especially their marriage and motherhood, emerges as a key concern for mental deficiency activists, but their care highlights diverging interests and real conflict over the management of mental deficiency as a legal, medical, social, moral, and eugenic problem.

Keywords: mental deficiency policy, institutional and community care, class, gender, marriage, motherhood, eugenics, control


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
L. Westwood
Care in the Community of the Mentally Disordered: The Case of the Guardianship Society, 1900-1939
Soc Hist Med, April 5, 2007; (2007) hkl079v1.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.