© 2000 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Articles |
They Might As Well Brand Us: Working-Class Resistance to Compulsory Vaccination in Victorian England
* Department of History, The Johns Hopkins University 3400 N Charles Street Baltimore, MD 21218, USA nadja{at}jhu.edu
From its origins in resistance to the 1853 Compulsory Vaccination Act, the Victorian anti-vaccination movement successfully challenged the public health policies of an increasingly interventionist state Anti-vaccinationists were not only middle-class reformers, but were also drawn from a politically active working class These campaigners saw compulsory vaccination as an extreme example of class legislation, for its policy and administration implicitly targeted working-class infants and inflicted multiple penalties on a public who considered themselves conscientious objectors Anti-vaccinationism was quickly absorbed into English working-class culture Indeed, it helped to reorganize working-class identities around the site of the vulnerable body thereby absorbing many people into a working class who interpreted the violation of their bodies as a form of political tyranny Participation in this movement was, however, also an exclusive exercise for anti-vaccinators, as respectable working-class citizens distinguished themselves from members of the undeserving classes This paper explores the class nature of the Vaccination Acts, their relationship to the New Poor Law, and the political implications of their administration It also imbeds anti-vaccinationism firmly within working-class culture, illustrating the campaign's relationship to popular protest and entertainment, and this legislation's impact upon working-class bodies.
Keywords: vaccination; anti-vaccination; smallpox; working class; respectability; state; body; conscientious objector
![]()
CiteULike
Connotea
Del.icio.us What's this?
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
A. M. Stern and H. Markel The History Of Vaccines And Immunization: Familiar Patterns, New Challenges Health Aff., May 1, 2005; 24(3): 611 - 621. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Bauch and D. J. D. Earn Vaccination and the theory of games PNAS, September 7, 2004; 101(36): 13391 - 13394. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Bellaby Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents' attitudes to combined MMR vaccination BMJ, September 27, 2003; 327(7417): 725 - 728. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. T. Bauch, A. P. Galvani, and D. J. D. Earn Group interest versus self-interest in smallpox vaccination policy PNAS, September 2, 2003; 100(18): 10564 - 10567. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


