Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1998 11(3):403-420; doi:10.1093/shm/11.3.403
© 1998 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (6)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MCINTOSH, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Profession, Skill, or Domestic Duty? Midwifery in Sheffield, 1881–1936

TANIA MCINTOSH*

* 62 Marcliffe Road, Wadsley, Sheffield S6 4AG, UK

SUMMARY Midwives today trace their professional identity back to the period following the midwifery regulation of 1902, when provisions were made for the training and registration of all midwives, and for the gradual elimination of the untrained practitioner. Some historians have argued that this represented a definite break and signalled the willingness of midwives to move towards a professional status. A comparison of midwifery in Sheffield pre- and post-regulation demonstrates no significant change in the practice and profiles of those in the occupation; all midwives remained primarily married or widowed part-time workers. Training for midwives was instituted early in Sheffield. Those trained had fairly high caseloads for the period, but their social and economic status was no different from non-trained midwives in the area. Regulation had a significant impact on the attitude of doctors towards midwives, who were increasingly viewed as part of a medical structure of care. Some midwives attempted to pursue collective action in order to improve their prospects, but they were in the minority. The limits to their professional development were demonstrated by their lack of control over supervision, their subordinate relationship to doctors, and their inability to work in unison.

Keywords: midwifery; professions; supervision; hospitals; 1902 Midwives Act; Sheffield; Britain; nineteenth century; twentieth century


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
I. Lowy
The Social History of Medicine: Beyond the Local
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 465 - 481.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
V. De Brouwere
The Comparative Study of Maternal Mortality over Time: The Role of the Professionalisation of Childbirth
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 541 - 562.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Soc Hist MedHome page
B. Dolan
Twenty Years of Social History of Medicine
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 435 - 440.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.