Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1998 11(1):49-71; doi:10.1093/shm/11.1.49
© 1998 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HENNOCK, E. P
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?

Articles

Vaccination Policy Against Smallpox, 1835–1914: A Comparison of England with Prussia and Imperial Germany

E. P HENNOCK*

*Professor E. P. Hennock, Department of History, University of Liverpool P. O. Box 147, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK

SUMMARY There are three identifiable phases in comparing vaccination policy in England, Prussia, and Imperial Germany. (1) Prior to the 1870s the tradition of medical police in Prussia resulted in the vaccination of the population being treated as a State responsibility earlier than in England and provided an appropriate administrative framework. The administrative pressure that could be exerted persuaded the Prussian authorities that legislation to make vaccination compulsory was unnecessary. In contrast, England and Wales lacked both the tradition and administrative structures of a medical police. Legislation (1840, 1853) for free and universal infant vaccination was followed by radical ideological and administrative innovation (II) From 1875 to 1889 both countries provided free and compulsory vaccination for all In England this was limited to infants; in Germany including Prussia, it included the re-vaccination of children. (III) After 1889 England and Germany began to diverge more sharply. In England vaccination rates fell and after 1898 conscientious objectors were excused from having to have their children vaccinated Germany retained compulsory vaccination and rates in the two countries increasingly diverged. England came to rely on the local public health administration for the surveillance and containment of smallpox, including selective vaccination of contacts. Despite these differences smallpox mortality dropped sharply in both countries, although in Germany somewhat earlier The English reliance on surveillance and containment prefigures that of the WHO in the eradication of smallpox in the Third World It suggests that the emphasis on the importance of high levels of mass vaccination in the German literature should perhaps be revised.

Keywords: smallpox; vaccination; England; Prussia; Germany; public health; medicine


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 BMJHome page
P. Bellaby
Communication and miscommunication of risk: understanding UK parents' attitudes to combined MMR vaccination
BMJ, September 27, 2003; 327(7417): 725 - 728.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.