Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1997 10(3):437-457; doi:10.1093/shm/10.3.437
© 1997 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by WOOLCOCK, H. R.
Right arrow Articles by SAUNDERS, K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Documents and Sources

‘My Beloved Chloroform’. Attitudes to Childbearing in Colonial Queensland:

A Case Study

HELEN R. WOOLCOCK, M. JOHN THEARLE and KAY SAUNDERS*

*Dr M. J. Thearle, Senior Lecturer in Paediatrics and Child Health, Department of Paediatrics and Child Health Mater Children's Hospital, South Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia

SUMMARY In 1847 the anaesthetic and analgesic properties of chloroform were discovered. This technology generated a new era for midwifery: mothers could be relieved of pain in childbirth. The introduction of chloroform for childbirth saw increasing medical dominance in obstetrics, traditionally in the hands of the midwife. At the same time the use of chloroform sparked a medical and moral controversy which lasted for several decades. On the one hand women were destined by the ‘curse of Eve’ to experience pain during childbirth; on the other, medical humanitarians and practitioners believed that there were technical and moral reasons for alleviating pain in childbirth. In concentrating on the debate historians have largely ignored the reactions of mothers to the introduction of the technology. This paper explores changing attitudes to childbearing within the context of colonial Queensland society, 1860–90, by examining the correspondence of an upper-class mother. Her education and liberal outlook, and a certain ambivalence towards motherhood, all influenced her attitude to the use of chloroform and the process of childbirth.

Keywords: colonial; childbirth; midwifery; chloroform; anaesthesia


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Soc Hist MedHome page
B. Dolan
Twenty Years of Social History of Medicine
Soc Hist Med, December 1, 2007; 20(3): 435 - 440.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.