Skip Navigation

Social History of Medicine 1997 10(2):291-304; doi:10.1093/shm/10.2.291
© 1997 by Society for the Social History of Medicine
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Search for citing articles in:
ISI Web of Science (10)
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by DALLY, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Discussion Point

The Rise and Fall of Pink Disease

ANN DALLY*

*Wellcome Institute for the History of Medicine 183 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE e-mail a.dally{at}wellcome.ac.uk

SUMMARY This paper explores the social and medical history and context of pink disease (acrodynia), a serious disease of infants and young children that baffled the medical world during the first half of the twentieth century until it was shown to be caused by mercury poisoning. In the English-speaking world the commonest source of the mercury was teething powders, which were widely available and advertised with increasing sophistication. Efforts to control them (such as the BMJ's campaign against ‘Secret Remedies’) were as yet unsuccessful. The article discusses the social conditions that influenced the existence and recognition of pink disease, the delay in finding its cause, the way in which it was explained as a virus infection or nutritional deficiency and why it seldom occurred outside the teething period. It discusses both professional and lay attitudes to health and diseases during the early twentieth century and provides a model how the disease developed in a specific social setting and how the medical profession attempted to deal with it within the limitations of contemporary professional thought. The resistance to the evidence of mercury poisoning is typical of resistance to new medical knowledge and declined only when the opponents and sceptics grew old and disappeared from the scene. Meanwhile, the cause having been identified and accepted, pink disease disappeared, but its consequences emerged much later, in an unexpected quater, as a cause of male infertility.

Keywords: acrodynia; azoospermia; calomel; diagnosis; disease and diseases; erythredema; Feer-Swift disease; intertility; ercury; mercury poisoning; patent medicines; pink disease; poisoning; social construction of disease; teething; Young's syndrome


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
AutismHome page
M. Waltz and P. Shattock
Autistic Disorder in Nineteenth-century London: Three Case Reports
Autism, March 1, 2004; 8(1): 7 - 20.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
International Journal of ToxicologyHome page
A. S. Holmes, M. F. Blaxill, and B. E. Haley
Reduced Levels of Mercury in First Baby Haircuts of Autistic Children
International Journal of Toxicology, July 1, 2003; 22(4): 277 - 285.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
M. Weinstein and S. Bernstein
Pink ladies: mercury poisoning in twin girls
Can. Med. Assoc. J., January 21, 2003; 168(2): 201 - 201.
[Full Text] [PDF]



Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.